South Dakota runs two affidavits, one for personal property and one for land
SDCL § 29A-3-1201 lets a successor collect personal property thirty days after the death on an affidavit stating that “the value of the entire estate, wherever located, less liens and encumbrances, does not exceed $100,000,” that no application or petition to appoint a personal representative is pending or granted anywhere, and that the successor is entitled to the property. The ceiling is measured on the whole estate net of liens, not only on the assets being collected.
One condition is South Dakota’s own: the affidavit must state that the decedent “has not incurred any indebtedness to the Department of Social Services for medical assistance for nursing home or other medical institutional care.” A decedent who received that care is outside the affidavit route whatever the estate is worth.
Land has a separate procedure. Under § 29A-3-1203, sixty days after the death a successor may file an affidavit with the register of deeds in every county where the decedent owned real property, together with a certified or authenticated copy of the death certificate, provided the decedent’s interest in all South Dakota real property does not exceed $50,000. Non-agricultural land may be valued from the assessment rolls for the year of death; agricultural land is valued at its fair market value on the date of death. The same Department of Social Services condition applies, every claiming successor signs, and the affidavit lists each successor’s relationship to the decedent and the value of the entire estate.
A successor named in the real-property affidavit has the protection and liability of a distributee under a deed of distribution, and must see that what is received is applied to liens, allowances, funeral and administration expenses and the other charges the section lists.
Source: SDCL §§ 29A-3-1201, 29A-3-1203, read from the enacting state’s own official publication on 2026-10-13. Quoted wording is the statute’s; the surrounding explanation is this site’s reading of it and is not legal advice.